Provider readinessInterfaces and provider certification may evolve. Check account capabilities before production use.Read the readiness contract

Promote WordPress and Site9 content

Create social drafts from published site content while keeping website operations separate from social delivery.

Direct answer

Create social drafts from published site content while keeping website operations separate from social delivery.

Where this pattern fits

Create social drafts from published site content while keeping website operations separate from social delivery.

Best for: WordPress publishers, Site9 users, content teams, and multi-site operators.

Problems this integration solves

Not every promoted property is WordPress.

Site publication and social publication have different approval and failure models.

Reusable social distribution should work from Site9, App9, a CRM, or an outside service.

Recommended workflow

  1. 1

    Read the canonical page title, excerpt, URL, and approved image from the website system.

  2. 2

    Create an App9 Post draft with platform and account overrides.

  3. 3

    Preview, approve, and schedule independently of the CMS publication event.

  4. 4

    Return social links and analytics to the site or campaign record through API or webhook.

System ownership boundary

Keep ownership explicit

Site9 or WordPress owns websites, content, SEO metadata, and site publishing. App9 Post owns social accounts, social content versions, media, delivery, feeds, analytics, and inbox records.

This boundary avoids synchronizing entire business databases into the publishing layer. Exchange stable identifiers and event references so both systems can reconcile without claiming ownership of the same record.

Expected outcomes

  • One promotion service for WordPress and non-WordPress sites
  • Modular access from Site9, App9, Jaxia, or external clients
  • Separate website and social audit trails

Frequently asked questions

What should remain in the integrating product?

Site9 or WordPress owns websites, content, SEO metadata, and site publishing. App9 Post owns social accounts, social content versions, media, delivery, feeds, analytics, and inbox records.

Can the integration work without the App9 Post scheduler UI?

Yes. The scheduler is one client of the same REST, SDK, MCP, SSE, and webhook interfaces available to other products.

Should an automated integration publish immediately by default?

No. It should declare draft, scheduled, or immediate mode explicitly and satisfy the brand approval and confirmation policy.

Was this useful? This documentation is reviewed against the public App9 Post contract. Use the API reference and live capability response for machine-enforced details.

Open API reference